By Qi Dan
EG1471 E25
Innovation plays an important role in today’s engineering design. However, in the paper “Innovation and performance in engineering design”[1], Salter and Torbett indicate that misunderstandings in performance measurement of engineering design do limit the innovative potential in many industries. Some firms focus too much on the financial benefit of their products while ignoring other essentials in engineering design such as user friendliness, safety and durability. Addressing this problem, Salter and Torbett [1] examine different approaches to assess engineering design based on interviews and feedbacks from both individuals and organizations.
First of all, commercial benefit is the most common concern when assessing engineering design as there is a distinct connection between performance failures and economic failures. Meanwhile, some claim that the best engineered product may not be the ones bring the most financial benefit. In this case, too much reliance on financial indicators would probably limit innovation. Furthermore, time as an indicator of performance may also restrict engineers’ creativity and even cause stresses on them. Similarly, due to the failure of current feedback mechanism, engineers have to conform to others’ view sometimes. The three factors discussed above shows that many industries are still in urgent need of an appropriate environment to promote innovation.
Designing is a complex process which involves collaboration between different departments. Although financial factors do create incentive for designing, other methods of performance measurement should also be involved in the process of engineering design. More importantly, to fully assess a product requires a closer interaction between designers and other department of a project.
Reference:
[1] A. Salter and R. Torbett, Innovation and Performance in Engineering Design. Construction Management and Economics. Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2003.
